Anapat Timangkul vs Roy Hobbs Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L L L L L
Form
L W L W L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Timangkul 1 - 0 Hobbs
They have played 3 sets in total, with Timangkul winning 2 and Hobbs winning 1. The last match between Timangkul and Hobbs was at the M15 Chiang Rai, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Anapat Timangkul getting the victory 4-6 6-3 10-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anapat Timangkul | 1 |
| Roy Hobbs | 0 |
M15 Chiang Rai(03-04-2022)
4
6
6
3
10
5
| Timangkul | Stats | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 22 | Age | 35 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 10% (3-27) | Career Total W/L | 36% (76-135) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 10-5 |
Stats 
Anapat Timangkul
Player
Roy Hobbs
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:34:0 | Average Match Time | 1:34:0 |
| 70% (62/89) | 1st Serve % | 69% (35/51) |
| 68% (42/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (27/35) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 11% (1/9) |
| 27% (14/51) | Return Points Win % | 39% (35/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anapat Timangkul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Anapat Timangkul
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
15
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuichiro Inui
Player
Anapat Timangkul
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Watt
Player
Anapat Timangkul
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ron Ellouck
Player
Anapat Timangkul
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jumpei Yamasaki
Player
Anapat Timangkul
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Anapat Timangkul
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Anapat Timangkul
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rohan Mehra
Player
Anapat Timangkul
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Lavizzari
Player
Anapat Timangkul
89%
(
58 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Geni Inoue
Player
Anapat Timangkul
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roy Hobbs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Dylan Jimenez
Player
Roy Hobbs
34%
(
26 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saud Alhogbani
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Roy Hobbs
100%
(
93 of
93)
1st Serve %
100%
(
83 of
83)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Roy Hobbs
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Roy Hobbs
44%
(
31 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roy Hobbs
Player
Blake Bayldon
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Minhtuan Pham
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roy Hobbs
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Issei Okamura
Player
Roy Hobbs
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10% (3/27) | Win/Loss | 36% (76/135) |
| 14% (9/55) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (186/286) |
| 34% (201/384) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (2036/2335) |
| 10% (3/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 35% (69/126) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 43 | Aces Total | 150 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 44 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
| 1:17:53 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 390.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 253.05 |
| 67% (1163/1730) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1862/3152) |
| 58% (679/1163) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1195/1862) |
| 40% (229/567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (533/1290) |
| 36% (33/91) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (83/231) |
| 30% (472/1568) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1037/3003) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 11% (3/25) | Futures W/L | 37% (76/128) |
| 10% (3/30) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (75/208) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (23/48) |
| 25% (1/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (84/67) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (84/17) |
| 4% (27/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (127/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
